Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 7001 - 7020 of 8,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
” The defendants contended that mere failure to follow policy was “not enough to show unlawfulness, causation is required”. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:22 am by David Doniger
  Better to think of this case as the nation’s last resort, if EPA does not act, or is blocked from acting. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:18 pm by Glenn Reynolds
While no one can irrefutably claim this is due to concealed carry, we can at least state with certainty that allowing concealed carry does not increase risks to a campus population and may even help. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:47 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Taken together (.17 x .273 = .046 or 4.6%), that means fewer than one in 20 state jail felony thefts reported statewide result in someone actually being convicted of the crime. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:23 am by Ernie Svenson
But these days, my $20 / month DSL connection does the job just as well. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 20 provides that the treaty is retroactive in effect as to extraditable offenses which were committed before the date of its entry into force if they were punishable under the laws of both Parties when committed. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 7:38 pm by Jeralyn
If the judge agrees on May 20, the obstruction conviction won't stand. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:43 am by Eric E. Johnson
The patient never agreed to receive the care, so does the patient owe the [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:03 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/3vfkboq (Michael Hutter) Does Police Use of GPS Devices Need Supreme Court Guidance? [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:00 am by Massimiliano Di Martino
Where a Community trademark court finds that a defendant has infringed or threatened to infringe a Community trademark, it is to issue an order prohibiting the defendant from proceeding with the acts which infringed or would infringe the Community trademark. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:27 am by Law Office of D. Hardison Wood
 Nor does it allow the jury to hear about the defendant’s liability insurance, that’s all still kept hidden from the jury. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We’re already seeing copyright and TM suits in Second Life; he defends Linden. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:52 pm by David Ettinger
Murphy:  Was defendant’s conviction under Penal Code section 115 preempted by Vehicle Code sections 20 and 10501, subdivision (a)? [read post]