Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7001 - 7020
of 9,861
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 4:13 pm
There was the first English “right to be forgotten” case and the most high profile case of the year was that brought by Sir Cliff Richard against the BBC. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm
English cases in this category included: Smith v ADFVN ([2008] EWHC 1797 (QB)); Clift v Clarke [2011] EWHC 1164 (QB); and El Diwany v Hansen and Others ([2011] EWHC 2077 (QB)) . [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
In Rodrigues v. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 4:11 pm
These workers often do not speak English, have not filed a workers’ compensation (WC) claim, have no understanding of the workers’ compensation system, are concerned about deportation, and are completely unaware of their options. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm
On the same day the trial in Ali-Khan v Galloway MP was fixed. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 5:09 pm
If your name is Marty McFly, you’re saying, “English, Doc, English. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm
As famously expressed by Knight Bruce V-C in Walter v Selfe (1851) 4 De G & Sm 315, 322, the question is whether the interference ought to be considered a material inconvenience “not merely according to elegant or dainty modes and habits of living, but according to plain and sober and simple notions among the English people”; see also Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd (2013) QB 455, para 36(ii). [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:00 am
Jockey International Inc v Darren Wilkinson [2010] ATMO 22Jockey is the registered owner of a number of trade marks relating to underwear featuring JOCKEY as a component. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:51 am
PFT Technology LLC v Wieser, Short Form Order, Index No. 8679/12 [Sup Ct Nassau County Feb. 20, 2014]. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:43 am
The court’s reference to Merest’s halfpenny comes from an 1814 English decision Merest v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:48 pm
After quickly dismissing the fourth question (which the Cour d’appel might indeed have referred somewhat prematurely at this stage), the Opinion (which is not available in English), starts with a comprehensive review of the Court’s case law on the interpretation of what is now Art. 7(1) Brussels Ia. [read post]
21 May 2019, 2:07 pm
In Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am
In 2000 Mance L.J. said in Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland: “Copyright does not lie on the same continuum as, nor is it the antithesis of, freedom of expression. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Court of Appeal finds no reason to swipe right in MATCH v MUZMATCH online dating disputeMatch Group, LLC v Muzmatch Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 454 (April 2023)“MATCH” is hardly a distinctive trade mark for an online dating, aka matchmaking, service. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
KIT KAT is back as the Advocate General gives his two fingerstwo centsNestlé v Mondelez v EUIPO Joined Cases C‑84/17 P, C‑85/17 P and C‑95/17 P (April 2018)In Volume II we reported on Nestlé’s loss of its UK shape mark for the four finger Kit Kat chocolate bar. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
Court of appeal of Brussels, 13 October 2022, Mylan v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 6:25 pm
Baltimore, and Dred Scott v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 8:52 am
” See Whyte v. [read post]
