Search for: "Label v Label" Results 7001 - 7020 of 13,306
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm by Mark Zamora
From Geek.com:AMARC Enterprises, a supplement maker, advertises the benefits of its product — a drug called Poly-MVA — through using supposed customer claims about it. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:56 am by Mark Zamora
In its unanimous decision, the three-judge panel wrote that “not only could PLIVA have independently updated its labeling to match that of the branded manufacturer … it had a federal duty to do so,” (Fulgenzi v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 7:13 am by jgconrad
[Editor's Note: We are pleased to publish this piece from Qiang Lu and Jack Conrad, both of whom worked with Thomson Reuters R&D on the WestlawNext research team. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 1:02 pm
Mutual’s argument is based on last year’s case, Pliva v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:59 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 37862 (D MD, March 15, 2013), a Maryland federal district court dismissed complaints by two Muslim inmates regarding accommodation of Ramadan fasting and failure to provide meals expressly labeled Halal.In Blanks v. [read post]