Search for: "People v. House" Results 7001 - 7020 of 12,872
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2015, 6:40 am
She learned there were two computers in the house, a laptop for the family and a desktop computer in the bedroom. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:18 am by Amy Howe
As I noted in my preview of Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:34 am by Ron Coleman
It’s a kind of magnetism I have, the way some people are just always being stopped by people who need directions. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:00 am by Amy Howe
The Court also heard oral argument Wednesday in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm by Joey Fishkin
 This is a claim articulated most fully (so far) by Justice Scalia in his brief concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
RFRA passed the Senate by a 97-3 vote, and passed the House unanimously. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Something of greater urgency had bumped the survivors of a massacre within the last few weeks of as many as 2,000 people from the first half of the show. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Or does it also prohibit racial or sales policies that have a negative impact on people with the protected characteristics? [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:50 am
Brad Heath at USA Today has this story discussing law enforcement use of radar devices that can determine whether people are present within a house. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 12:11 pm
Evans put an end to growing state-wide efforts to repeal all civil rights law protecting gay people from discrimination. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 8:52 am by William Eskridge
   Starting with his landmark opinion for the Court in Romer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm by Steve Sanders
Metropolitan Housing Development Corp., Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. [read post]