Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 7001 - 7020
of 41,391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2008, 7:11 am
(See Brij Bhushan v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:55 am
RYBA V. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:11 pm
467/08, Padawan SL v Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE) had just been uploaded on to the Curia website. [read post]
17 May 2017, 4:10 am
At The National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen notes that in District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:21 am
For example, in the securities law context, a Second Circuit panel upheld the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest, but only after finding that a private plaintiff—not the state plaintiffs—had Article III standing (See, XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:28 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:14 am
The Presumption of Sound Condition is a powerful doctrine when used appropriately. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:14 am
The Presumption of Sound Condition is a powerful doctrine when used appropriately. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 11:56 am
‘Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 7:00 am
See Sanislo v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 11:58 am
But the proposal is less desirable where the problem is excessive ownership power coupled with discriminatory enforcement, because (a) the only remedy would be to completely invalidate the patent, and (b) the First Amendment may not apply because the problem is power with discriminatory enforcement, not the PTO’s decision to issue the patent (as described above, First Amendment scrutiny can only reach the analytical levels at which state action occurs).Professor… [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 2:59 pm
Related Cases: Google v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 7:13 am
Krugman v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
This case represents a subtle but real shift from current 8th Circuit law as stated in Fjellestad v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 1:15 pm
” If a state has no “legitimate interest” in particular claims, a defendant should not be forced to submit to the coercive power of the state with respect to those claims. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:27 pm
In 1964, in Reynolds v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:48 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Oklahoma v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:19 am
Anderson: States cannot disqualify candidates for federal offices from the ballot under Section 3. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:16 am
United Haulers v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 7:25 am
Merisant Co. v. [read post]
