Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 7001 - 7020
of 13,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2015, 6:30 am
A different panel heard argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:54 pm
Sabraw of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California requested briefing on whether a Rule 54(b) judgment--final (thus appealable), but with respect to a subset of the claims in the case--should be entered or not. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 4:01 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:35 pm
By Thomas Kaufman (follow me on Twitter) As anticipated, today the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 6:54 am
’” His conduct was also sufficiently reprehensible to qualify for punitive damages under state law (Marlo v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 6:13 pm
Schulz and State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 6:09 pm
"While we do not think that the trial court was equating itself with the United States Supreme Court," Yegan wrote, "the effect of its ruling can only be equated with overruling Marchman. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:14 am
California and United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 4:05 am
Anthony California, Inc., et al. (11/13/2007, non-precedential): affirmed appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California (case no. 03-CV-874); no reasoning provided within the opinion HIF Bio, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
" Kimble v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
In this circumstance, it is not surprising that leading Democratic politicians, progressive legal scholars, and centrist or center-left groups like Common Cause have portrayed a new convention called under Article V of the 1787 Constitution as an anathema that would destroy what is left of the federal system sustaining the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 12:45 am
Before the district court, Blockbuster asserted that CAFA had reversed the traditional rule that the party seeking removal to federal court bears the burden of establishing federal jurisdiction, citing a recent decision by the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Yeroushalmi v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 7:13 am
United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
United States, in which the Court also heard oral argument yesterday. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:56 am
Several basic themes emerge from a survey of the history and law of quarantine in the United States. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:57 pm
With United States v. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:56 pm
Probably United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:59 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf wonders why the dissenters to the court’s order late last week in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
