Search for: "State v. Argus " Results 7001 - 7020 of 85,045
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2016, 7:39 am
On December 14, 2015, the Supreme Court of the State of Utah issued its ruling in the case of DIRECTV and DISH Network v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 10:05 pm by Matthew Campbell
-response-to-mtdDownload doc.-025-statement-of-interest-of-the-us-turtle-mtn-v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:27 pm by WIMS
An unpublished opinion appealed from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 10:00 am by Sarah Grant
He also argues, in the alternative, that the length of his detention cannot be reconciled with traditional law of war principles, as read into the AUMF by the Supreme Court in Hamdi v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day is United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
He argued another eight cases for the government, including this past Term’s United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 7:41 pm
Without ruling on the posttrial motion, the trial court vacated the original judgment on the jury verdict and entered a new judgment dismissing the case pursuant to the settlement.The state appealed from the judgment of dismissal, arguing that the parties could not bargain away the state's 60 percent share of the award. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am by ASAD KHAN
Arguing that his return to Algeria would result in violations of ECHR, art 3, he appealed and in April 2006 he was granted bail conditional upon finding suitable accommodation; but none was found and he stayed in Broadmoor. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:35 pm by Lyle Denniston
Judge Shaw’s dissent did not take a position on the constitutionality of the state ban on same-sex marriage, arguing that it was premature for the state supreme court to decide that issue when no lower state court had first ruled on it. [read post]