Search for: "State v. C. S."
Results 7001 - 7020
of 37,717
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2012, 3:38 am
The Supreme Court’s decision last year in State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
§ 1125(c)(3)(C) by claiming its humorous use of the Jack Daniel’s marks was not pure commercial speech because it poked fun at the company in the Bad Spaniels design. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:57 pm
Under Breuer v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 4:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 5:45 am
Aktiebolag v. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:18 am
State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
In a bench ruling in the case, City of Miami General Employees’ & Sanitation Employees’ Retirement Trust v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 3:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:43 am
The Coca-Cola Company v.Meenaxi Enterprise, Inc., 2021 U.S.P.Q.2d 709 (T.T.A.B. 2021) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
23 May 2008, 5:29 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 11:38 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:50 am
State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 3:59 pm
Tuesday’s first argument is in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 6:10 am
For example, Civil Service Law §75.2 provides that “compliance with technical rules of evidence shall not be required,” while §3020-a.3.c(C) of the Education Law states “rules and procedures for the conduct of hearings ... shall not require compliance with technical rules of evidence. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:20 am
C. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 9:45 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:11 pm
It’s no secret that the motion picture and recording industries are unhappy with the current state of the law on the scope of the DMCA safe harbors—most notably the safe harbor in section 512(c) for service providers that provide “storage at the direction of…user[s]. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:11 pm
It’s no secret that the motion picture and recording industries are unhappy with the current state of U.S. law on the scope of safe harbors for online intermediaries—most notably the safe harbor in section 512(c) for service providers that provide “storage at the direction of…user[s]. [read post]
