Search for: "State v. Mai"
Results 7001 - 7020
of 133,205
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2023, 6:56 am
Covington Specialty Insurance Company v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
The Bardal factors come from the decision in Bardal v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
The Bardal factors come from the decision in Bardal v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
" Citing Matter of Curtis v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 124 AD3d 1117, the court noted that upon investigating a complaint, SDHR may dismiss it without a hearing "if it concludes that no probable cause exists" and that "Courts give deference to SDHR due to its experience and expertise in evaluating allegations of discrimination, and will only disturb a determination of no probable cause if it is arbitrary [and] capricious or lacks a rational… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
" Citing Matter of Curtis v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 124 AD3d 1117, the court noted that upon investigating a complaint, SDHR may dismiss it without a hearing "if it concludes that no probable cause exists" and that "Courts give deference to SDHR due to its experience and expertise in evaluating allegations of discrimination, and will only disturb a determination of no probable cause if it is arbitrary [and] capricious or lacks a rational… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
See also United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Dolinak v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:57 am
Samuel Alito apparently hasn’t learned that saying nothing may be the best way of saying something significant. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
The United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
Constraining the holding in this way may help make U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:12 am
” In a post earlier this year, Frank McRoberts discussed the Doeblin v MacArthur case in which the Manhattan Commercial Division stated the rule that a fiduciary duty is imposed upon the non-managing member who shares management duties or takes control of management duties where management duties are not shared, but ultimately found that the complaint in that case failed adequately to allege that the defendant non-managing member shared management or assumed any managerial… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:05 am
Last week, federal district courts in three states handed down decisions in cases in which a former employee was suing his or her employer for refusing to provide them with a religious exemption from the employer's Covid vaccine mandate.In Crocker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:38 am
Interestingly, the European patent was only very recently granted (on 17 May 2023) and is still in the opposition period. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:44 am
Polmear and another v Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, heard 15th May 2023. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
United States On 13 June 2023, the Texas Governor signed HB4 to make Texas the tenth state to have a comprehensive privacy law. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
On May 25, 2023, the United States Supreme Court decided Sackett v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
On May 25, 2023, the United States Supreme Court decided Sackett v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:53 pm
After United States v. [read post]
