Search for: "State v. Register" Results 7001 - 7020 of 13,700
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2014, 8:47 pm by Kirk Jenkins
During its September term, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral argument in Bettis v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:48 pm by Kirk Jenkins
During its September term, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Marks v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 3:33 am by SHG
  Even in its most extreme, People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 11:22 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
[WK Note: At the time of the NELI briefing, the comment deadline was November 6, 2014, but, in an October 31 announcement and subsequent Federal Register notice (79 FR 65613-65614), the OFCCP extended the comment period for an additional 60 days.] [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:45 pm by Nursing Home Law Center LLC
Jump to: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W A Back to top Acute care – A high level of care provided to a patient for a medical condition or illness that a patient is likely to recover from. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 10:42 am by Loreen Peritz
The following collections of historical primary law are available: United States Code 1925-1988 (includes content up to 1993) From Guide to Law Online: United States Law United States Reports v. 1-542 (1754-2004) From Guide to Law Online: United States Judiciary Code of Federal Regulations (1938-1995) From Guide to Law Online: Executive Federal Register v. 1-58 (1936-1993) From Guide to Law Online: Executive While not as… [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:06 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 In the closing days of its September term, the Illinois Supreme Court agreed to decide that issue in Stone Street Partners, LLC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:45 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark THE EGG for "facial toning machines for cosmetic use" on the ground of mere descriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:05 pm by Whittel & Melton, LLC
The newest of the recalled vehicles were sold or registered in 12 high-humidity states. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:15 am by Farah Mukaddam (UK)
In response, Specsavers relied not on the use of the wordless mark itself, but on the use of the following logo (which became known as the ‘shaded logo’): Article 15 of the CTM Regulation states that the use of a registered trade mark may be made “in a form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark in the form in which it was registered”. [read post]