Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 7001 - 7020
of 14,004
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2015, 12:23 pm
By Jason Starling In what looks to be an ominous development for public-sector unions, the United States Supreme Court, on June 30, 2015, granted a petition for certiorari by the plaintiffs in Friedrichs v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 11:01 am
To be sure, the United States Supreme Court case of Van Orden v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:00 am
This occurs despite Civil Code 1941.1 which clearly provides that the presence of vermin can render a unit untenable and decisions like Green v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
With the Obama Administration construing the United States Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:48 am
United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
Perhaps worse, this standard is stated as being the standard for the Lanham Act in a state law consumer protection case, with citation of but no apparent comprehension of the difference between literal falsity and literal truth that is nonetheless misleading. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am
United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:16 am
Commentary on the Ninth Circuit (Opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:54 am
According to the Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC), approximately 15,000 golf cart-related injuries take place every year in the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
Speeding is a major cause of accidents in the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:33 am
V. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm
United States A jury is considering the merits of a $850 million libel claim in the case of Bouveng v Wey. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 10:58 am
In Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:54 pm
We are eager to help you with your case so that you and your spouse may enjoy the benefits of marriage in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:29 pm
Texas and United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm
Closing debate tends to close minds. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
United States, 14-419, before it), Umaña v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution entitled same-sex couples to equal treatment with married heterosexual couples under federal law in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
” Another example close on the heels of David v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:05 am
In a landmark decision issued by the United States Supreme Court in Obergefell v. [read post]
