Search for: "AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTIONÂ "
Results 7021 - 7040
of 8,652
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
American Savings Bank, 508 U.S. 324, 327, 113 S.Ct. 2106, 124 L.Ed.2d 228 (1993); see also §§ 301(a), 1321; Fed. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:45 am
Incitement, by contrast, involves advocacy "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action" that is "likely to incite or produce such action. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:33 am
Here, the parties aren’t competitors, but the principle is the same as that in cases finding that competitors don’t have a cause of action under the Wisconsin DTPA. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
Dammann & Co., 594 F.3d 238, 253 (3d Cir. 2010):[W]e have exercised restraint in accordance with the well-established principle that where two competing yet sensible interpretations of state law exist, we should opt for the interpretation that restricts liability, rather than expands it, until the Supreme Court of [that state] decides differently.Lexington National Insurance Corp. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
In what American courts does the Act apply? [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:12 pm
In ruling to dismiss the case, Judge Sherwood ruled that “[r]ecognition of a foreign judgment involves a determination by an American court that the judgment is valid and binding on the parties with respect to the subject matter, claims and issues involved in the action…If the foreign forum provides a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issues before a court of competent jurisdiction, under a system of procedural fairness analogous to the principles… [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:44 am
Those who focus on process, including Moreno-Ocampo, suggest that selection decisions can enhance the Court’s legitimacy if they adhere to recognized principles of good process such as independence, impartiality, objectivity, and transparency. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
The precautionary principle--which is widely in use in Europe and used to a less substantial degree in American law--holds that where some untested technology or other course of action holds out a potentially large but currently unknown risk, the burden of proof should be on the proponents of the technology or course of action to prove that it is safe, rather than on the regulator to prove that it is unsafe, before proceeding. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:09 am
The Money Class: Learn to Create Your New American Dream by Suze Orman. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:42 pm
What Barry Bonds did by using prohibited performance enhancing substances and then lying under oath about his actions was to violate not just the integrity of baseball but of core American values as well. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:58 pm
Juxtaposing the discussion of American might abroad with American poverty at home makes it clear that the issue is political will, not lack of wealth. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:12 am
This intention does not in principle fit with a situation whereby members fight each other with infringement actions: “Such action is directly contrary to the wish to promote the use of the standard. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
An explanation of the Obama Doctrine should give Americans a clear idea of the general principles that guide the administration's national security policy. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:20 am
First, it was not a war in the strict sense, he argued, but a “police action” under the U.N. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:05 pm
These are seen as issues with compliance or enforcement, not with the principle of regulation, or with the technology. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:57 am
Self-regulatory principles, from major players: education, transparency, consumer control, data security, consumer notification for change in how data is treated, special procedures for treatment of sensitive data, and accountability for implementing the other principles. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
§ 292 (Patent Law Practice Center) The Courts and Congress take aim at patent false marking lawsuits (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Resolving different courts’ constructions: American Piledriving Equipment Inc., v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm
But none of this should prevent American courts from enforcing arbitral decisions rendered under foreign or religious law, where the decisions do not involve any court action that would be contrary to American public policy, but simply resolve commercial disputes or disputes related to the governance of a religious body.3. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:24 pm
Please take action. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
The press releases posted on the Internet specifically provided contact information for Canadian media, as well as American and UK media outlets. [read post]
