Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 7021 - 7040 of 21,856
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 6:21 am by Howard Wasserman
A recent Second Circuit decision, New York City v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 5:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Dodge, Inc. v BZ Results, LLC, 95 AD3d 774, 774 [1st Dept 2012] [citations omitted]). [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 8:23 am by Jayne Ponder
 As Justice Thomas reflected in his recent statement on the denial of certiorari in Malwarebytes, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:33 pm
"  In other words, they are part of the model judicial ethics code that the ABA has recommended to the states for adoption. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 6:50 am
Bill Childs notes a Baylor Law Review study polling Texas judges on whether they think there are problems requiring tort reform based on what they see in their own courtroom. [read post]
To the shock of employers, on May 2, 2019, a unanimous three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals (the Panel), in Vasquez v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Town of Barnstable v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637, affd 35 NY3d 173; see Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d at 785). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 6:38 am by Thom Cooper
A recent Pennsylvania decision, Health Care & Retirement Corporation of America v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:58 pm
And, as here, the person who suffers will be a third party (the victim), who -- as here -- doesn't get paid even a smidgeon of her injuries and medical (or, as here, funeral) bills, because the insurance caps out at $25,000 per person and $50,000 total and the people who own and drove the car are (as here) judgment proof.Plus, I've got a great little business model after today's opinion. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 10:46 pm by Simon Gibbs
  The Claimant's Bill claimed a 100% success fee on the basis that the fixed EL success fees had been applied to the case when the claim was accepted under the CCFA and the matter had settled at trial. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
The dust continues to settle from Wednesday’s argument in June Medical Services v. [read post]