Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 7021 - 7040 of 21,455
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2018, 2:20 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
When faced with a claim of juror bias, Remmer v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 11:46 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Reynolds (Indian Civil Rights Act; Tribal Officials) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlHarjo v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 11:44 am by Native American Rights Fund
Reynolds (Indian Civil Rights Act; Tribal Officials) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlHarjo v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
 We therefore suggest that Section 14 of the Bill be modified to state: The following contracts cannot be specifically enforced "All contracts can be specifically enforced unless the promisor in breach of the contract establishes that... [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:12 am by SHG
” (This push gained little traction; but Chief Justice John Roberts, who helped draft the measure as a young administration staffer, would go on to pen the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in Herring v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 11:47 am by John Buhl
Erratum: This post originally stated that the bill eliminated the solar tax credit. [read post]
8 May 2018, 12:13 pm by Hayley Evans
Circuit Court’s judgment affirming Judge Tanya Chutkan’s April 19 transfer injunction in Doe v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Five of these laws were passed in past three years and several more states are currently considering bills to prohibit this type of discrimination. [read post]
7 May 2018, 6:17 am by Terry Hart
Most importantly, the bill only applied prospectively—that is, it only afforded federal copyright protection to sound recordings fixed after the bill’s effective date of February 15, 1972. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Evening Standard editor George Osborne has criticised the proposed Data Protection Bill stating that cost amendment provisions shifting Claimants’ legal costs to papers would be unduly onerous. [read post]