Search for: "Does 1 through 10," Results 7021 - 7040 of 21,532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
BYOCs and BYODs have to be linked if records that are stored on personal mobile devices are to be accessed through the internet. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
BYOCs and BYODs have to be linked if records that are stored on personal mobile devices are to be accessed through the internet. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:41 am by Paul Karlsgodt
Ct. 2869 (2010) that § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 does not have an extraterritorial reach. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:10 am by Doug Cornelius
  If you are still wondering if a real estate fund might need to register, look through the list of fund types: Question 10: Type of Private Fund: For purposes of this question the following definitions apply: “Hedge fund” means any private fund that: a. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:00 am
If the defendant does not skip out on bail and returns to court as scheduled, the defendant will receive the collateral back and the bondsman will receive the $10,000 back from the court and keep the 10% fee. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Kevin
  So, let us do the obligatory top 10 (or 25) list and then be done with the utterly horrible year of 2017, how does that sound? [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
But I think $1 billion in retaliatory tariffs being pressed on the U.S. would have been felt. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 3:50 pm by Mike
I will give anyone here 10-to-1 odds that Barclay's earned more than $30 million in profits during each year. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:39 am by Brian M. Culnan
  An employee paid $10 per hour is scheduled to work 8 hours a day Monday through Friday, for a total of 40 hours a week. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:24 pm by Jeffrey J. Randa
There are 2 classes of Revocations: A 1-year mandatory minimum Revocation for 2 DUI's within 7 years, and A 5-year mandatory minimum Revocation for 3 or more DUI's within 10 years. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:28 am by Roel van Woudenberg
            On 25.10.2019, the applicant submitted further argumentation in support of accepting a machine as the inventor, arguing Rule 19(1) EPC does not require that the inventor is a human and explaining that the purpose of Rule 19(1) EPC is to properly identify the inventor. [read post]