Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 7021 - 7040
of 8,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2010, 4:10 am
"The arbitrator explicitly recognized that school district had the authority to lay off employees for economic reasons without violating the CBA but nevertheless concluded that the Council “bore a disproportionate share of the projected budgetary shortfall. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:51 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.July 13 - 10 AM: Rocket Trademarks Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:50 pm
This week we discuss the proposed introduction of a “single publication rule” Background Under English libel law, ‘publication’ occurs on each occasion that a statement is accessed as opposed to the occasion on which it is – in lay terms – published. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:15 am
V. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:26 am
52/05 P Sweden and Turco v Council [2008] ECR I? [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
In Rasul and Hamdan, Stevens firmly asserted the right of habeas corpus against the executive during wartime, laying the groundwork for non-citizens to claim that right in the landmark Boumediene. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 9:41 am
National Insurance, concluding that it is being misinterpreted, and lays down dangerous precedent for insurance claims. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:05 am
The Court lays general ground rules. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
Unlike s97 Children Act 1989 (which makes publication of information identifying a child, his school or his address a criminal offence and which will be repealed as the Act is brought into force) the provisions of the Act do not cease to bite at the conclusion of proceedings, but operate without end point as with s12 Administration of Justice Act 1960 (which defines circumstances where publication may amount to a contempt of court, and is also to be substantively repealed on enactment of Part II),… [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:30 am
The article covered hearing on June 23, 2010, for the brain injury case of Gagnon v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:30 am
The article covered hearing on June 23, 2010, for the brain injury case of Gagnon v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
The difficulty lay in defining those exceptions [para 11]. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:41 am
The difficulty lay in defining those exceptions [para 11]. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
Surprising Stuff Under the Hood of the Financial Reform Act: In recent posts (most recently here) I noted the possibility that the Supreme Court’s decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 4:18 am
McHale v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:07 pm
However – particularly in the absence of any media arguments to the contrary – Lord Rodgers was at pains to emphasise that the judgment should not be regarded as laying down any general rule as to the way that applications for anonymity orders should be determined in control order cases. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:38 pm
Today, in the landmark decision of McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
In Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:24 am
That is, the priority right lay with the three inventors (or their successors in title) jointly, and not separately. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:21 am
Discerning readers will however note that this issue also lay at the heart of last week's Patents Court ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), noted here by the IPKat. [read post]
