Search for: "MATTER OF P S"
Results 7021 - 7040
of 18,883
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
In many cases you can say that you just don’t have copyright over the matter claimed.Ramsey: interacts w/remedy: suppose P is trying to cover facts; is entire copyright invalid? [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Sys., 847 P.2d 440, 451 (Wash. 1993)). [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 12:29 am
Firemark.Entertainment Law Offices of Gordon P. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
If result is thin protection for some that’s cool.McKenna: reason for excluding from © matters: if it’s b/c they aren’t original, existence of alternatives wouldn’t matter so much. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am
Does the P have to rebut the defense or does the D have to prove the four factors? [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 7:21 am
Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94, 127 S. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 7:09 am
By interfering with the executrix’s management and ultimate sale of [the LLC], the [daughters] have violated the in terrorem clause of the will and have forfeited their legacies (Matter of Sochurek, NYLJ, July 20, 2016, p. 31 at *8). [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 7:09 am
By interfering with the executrix’s management and ultimate sale of [the LLC], the [daughters] have violated the in terrorem clause of the will and have forfeited their legacies (Matter of Sochurek, NYLJ, July 20, 2016, p. 31 at *8). [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:03 am
One other note on this case—plaintiff asserted on appeal that the trial court should have converted the motion to dismiss to one for summary judgment, as matters outside the pleadings were considered. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
This is a statistically significant differences (p-value=0.000). [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 12:01 am
. - Law) has posted Foreign Assistance Complicity (Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 54, no. 3, p. 531, 2016). [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
Carver, 113 Wn.2d 591, 604, 781 P.2d 1308, 789 P.2d 306 (Washington Supreme Court 1989).State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
P. 11(b). [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 2:30 pm
A&P alleged that element number 3, causation, in which the employer’s negligence is seen to be responsible for the employee’s injury, was not proven in this matter. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 1:07 pm
Rule 35 does not incorporate Rule 32's requirement that the court make findings on disputed or controverted matters. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 7:02 am
Board Composition Board composition* S&P 500 S&P MidCap 400 S&P SmallCap 600 S&P 1500 Russell 3000 Age 62 years 63 years 62 years 62 years 61 years Gender diversity 2 (21%) 2 (16%) 1 (14%) 2 (17%) 1 (14%) Independence 85% 82% 81% 83% 79% Tenure 9 years 9 years 9 years 9 years 8 years * Numbers based on all directorships in each index; gender diversity data represents average number of women directors… [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 7:59 am
” In P, the Supreme Court interpreted the statute as requiring claims to “inform those skilled in the art about the scope of the invention with reasonable certainty. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 1:28 am
Anders ValentinHortenThe Danish Maritime and Commercial Court recently rendered judgement (SH2016.T-5-14) in a matter between Ametek Denmark A/S and the intellectual property consultancy Zacco Denmark A/S. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
[P]roof can be made only by some other person, who was a witness of its execution, and at the same time subscribed his name to the conveyance as a witness. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
[P]roof can be made only by some other person, who was a witness of its execution, and at the same time subscribed his name to the conveyance as a witness. [read post]
