Search for: "Parks v. State" Results 7021 - 7040 of 10,183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2016, 4:35 am by INFORRM
  As Laing J observed in Merlin v Cave [2014] EWHC 3036 (QB): “There is no express indication in the PHA that Parliament intended the provisions of the PHA to abrogate the rights conferred by Article 10, or to change the law of defamation, which is, by necessary implication, involved in any consideration of the scope of the legitimate restrictions which may be placed by a contracting state on the rights conferred by Article 10. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court upheld an essentially identical state law in the 1965 case of Cox v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:45 am by SHG
As Cristian Farias explains, the 1968 decision in Piggie Park puts the question to rest. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
An infantile child prank becomes a felony charge for the perpetrator.Last year, Justice Scalia noted in in his partial concurrence in Kansas v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am by Tiffany Blofield
  The case involving the REDSKINS mark is currently on hold until the United States Supreme Court decides the In re Tam case. [read post]