Search for: "People v Word"
Results 7021 - 7040
of 17,915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm
May not be case by case but we have to figure out where and why to draw lines, some of which will be normative but not all.McKenna: surveys directed at words—Gucci v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:23 am
That essay concluded: “The amendment would unleash hordes of provincial headline-seeking prosecutors using countless broadly worded and possibly antiquated laws to go after Internet companies outside their states. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:20 am
The Court of Appeals has vacated the verdict, and the employer wins.The case is Stevens v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:08 am
However, Katz v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:37 am
And then there is the non-textual decision, such as the Supreme Court’s Graham v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
It’s different working with someone who prefers logic and consistency v. those who focus instead on the people and circumstances. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm
In December last year, Jordan secured a partial victory: the People’s Supreme Court in China ruled that 乔丹 was primarily associated with Jordan the person, not the company, and cancelled these marks. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm
In December last year, Jordan secured a partial victory: the People’s Supreme Court in China ruled that 乔丹 was primarily associated with Jordan the person, not the company, and cancelled these marks. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm
The Court of Appeal of Malaysia had recently provided its grounds of judgment for an important decision in Y-Teq Auto Parts (M) Sdn Bhd v X1R Global Holdings & Anor (CACA NO. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:06 am
Barrett v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 10:46 am
See the decision in TransAm Trucking v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:58 am
AMID, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:02 pm
” People tuning in to find out whether Judge Gorsuch intends to vote to overturn Roe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:13 pm
And when lists go on—as a Maine dairy company recently learned the hard way in O’Connor v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
” [4] In other words, the defendant did not get to see if the court would rule in his favor, but remain a fugitive in case he lost. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 4:58 am
Tequila Cuervo La Rojena, S.A. de C.V. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 8:38 pm
Arndtstein v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:01 am
But sometimes the absence of the Oxford comma can make a difference in meaning.Recently, in O’Connor et al v. [read post]
