Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 7021 - 7040 of 10,141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2012, 6:06 am by Mandelman
  She didn’t know it for several months, but the amount she was paying was $104.27 short of the required amount. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:40 pm by Zachary Spilman
Nealy, 71 M.J. _ (C.A.A.F. 2012) and United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Schutz Container Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
  What the American people want is an economy that doesn’t feel like the United States of Quicksand. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 10:15 pm by Leland E. Beck
Litigation: The United States District Court for the District of Columbia will hear cross motions to dismiss / summary judgment in National Restaurant Association [NRA] v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 7:14 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
  Except for the City of Ottawa and one other respondent, the respondents were all non-Ontario parties and resided or carried on business in the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 6:57 am by Thomas Heintzman
  Except for the City of Ottawa and one other respondent, the respondents were all non-Ontario parties and resided or carried on business in the United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 10:08 pm
Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co., Judge Presnell (United States District Court - Florida - Orlando Division) would no doubt agree. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:23 am by Leland E. Beck
In short, the regulations would amend DOL regulations that have governed nonimmigrant aliens admitted to the United States on a temporary basis to perform temporary non-agricultural labor or services. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:14 pm by William A. Ruskin
An earlier Ninth Circuit decision in the case discussed how Teck’s smelter had dumped slag waste into the Columbia River, ten miles north of the border, over several decades of operation, which resulted in pollution downstream in the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Time will tell.Notes:We covered the Ninth Circuit’s decision in the Hubei v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:02 am
The document emanates from the United States Patent and Trademark Office and is titled "Notice of Request for Comments on the Feasibility of Placing Economically Significant Patents Under a Secrecy Order and the Need to Review Criteria Used in Determining Secrecy Orders Related to National Security". [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:35 am
Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Michigan Attorney General also previously filed an antitrust action on the same matter (United States of America v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:45 am by Gideon
Twenty five years ago yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued one if its most shameful opinions in recent history: McCleskey v. [read post]