Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 7021 - 7040
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2014, 8:45 am
District Court took up a loose end left by the Supreme Court’s holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:26 am
(See Lasership, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
The key law relied upon in the case, the Alien Tort Statute, requires, after a 2013 Supreme Court decision called Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum, that plaintiffs show that the matter “touch and concern” the United States in order for the case to proceed here. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:43 am
If this was a fair fight, I might bet on Apple and its technology, but the government of the United States of America does not believe in fair fights. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 6:20 am
Carnival Corporation et al., Case No. 2:12 CV 05517, filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 5:30 am
The recent cell phone case, Riley v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 11:00 am
There have been no reports of such incidents in the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
We foresee no obstacle to a State’s dealing effectively with this problem. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:12 am
Prior to Myriad, the US Supreme Court held in Mayo v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:53 pm
On July 21, 2014, in Felczer v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 5:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 5:06 pm
And in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 12:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
Murray, University of California, Berkeley School of LawDoug NeJaime, University of California, Irvine School of LawNeil S. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 4:05 am
In Doe I v. [read post]
