Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 7021 - 7040
of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
CPR 39.3(5) states that the Court may only grant a set aside application if the applicant: (a) acted promptly when he found out that the court had exercised its power to……enter judgment or make an order against him; (b) had a good reason for not attending the trial; and (c) has a reasonable prospect of success at trial. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
,v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 4:20 pm
The DOJ filed the case, United States v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 8:18 am
The end result is that Sarah Palin can sue the New York Times for defamation.The case is Palin v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
NYSUT’s local affiliates represent library media specialists, who staff school libraries throughout New York State. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
NYSUT’s local affiliates represent library media specialists, who staff school libraries throughout New York State. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:26 am
In particular she examined four areas in which the changing interpretation of Convention rights is more problematic: ‘(a) the interpretation of the ‘autonomous concepts’ in the Convention; (b) the implication of further rights into those expressed; (c) the development of positive obligations; and (d) the narrowing of the margin of appreciation permitted to member states’ Examining these areas she stated that the limits of the ‘living… [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:49 pm
SeePearson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:11 am
Once it said: (a) litigants can agree to arbitrate statutory rights prior to the dispute, but (b) they cannot waive those rights and (c) normal contractual remedies apply, a result like the one in Rent-A-Center was in play. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am
Makes sense b/c consumer protection law’s goal is information safety and not vindicating rights of decedent. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
The Supreme Court of Canada released its decision this morning in the case of R. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 12:55 pm
Sky v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:19 am
(Lucas v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm
§ 157(c)(2)).BackgroundMs. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am
Alternatively, the alien can be “paroled,” i.e., released into the United States on conditions pending resolution of his application. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
Essentially, neither party was able to obtain insurance against Southwark’s costs if they lost (ATE insurance) and so B & C had undertaken to indemnify them against those costs. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
P. 15(c)(1)(B)--the federal analogue to Arkansas Rule 15(c)(1)--to similar facts, and refused to apply the federal analogue to Arkansas Rule 15(c)(2) to an amended complaint substituting one lead plaintiff for another in a class action. [read post]
