Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 7021 - 7040
of 29,295
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2020, 8:39 am
Scott v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 4:28 am
In some cases, disputes about that process are settled by the courts, with the most notable example being the Bush v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 2:53 pm
Department of the Interior (Trust Relationship)State of California v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
§ 1158(b)(2)(A)(v). [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
" United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 1:20 am
However, the courts have allowed suits to be brought if two conditions are fulfilled: (i) Congress must have enacted “unequivocal statutory language” abrogating the States’ immunity from the suit; and (ii) some constitutional provision must allow Congress to have thus encroached on the States’ sovereignty. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 1:20 am
However, the courts have allowed suits to be brought if two conditions are fulfilled: (i) Congress must have enacted “unequivocal statutory language” abrogating the States’ immunity from the suit; and (ii) some constitutional provision must allow Congress to have thus encroached on the States’ sovereignty. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 1:20 am
However, the courts have allowed suits to be brought if two conditions are fulfilled: (i) Congress must have enacted “unequivocal statutory language” abrogating the States’ immunity from the suit; and (ii) some constitutional provision must allow Congress to have thus encroached on the States’ sovereignty. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 1:20 am
However, the courts have allowed suits to be brought if two conditions are fulfilled: (i) Congress must have enacted “unequivocal statutory language” abrogating the States’ immunity from the suit; and (ii) some constitutional provision must allow Congress to have thus encroached on the States’ sovereignty. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 9:27 am
USA, LLC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 8:25 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court delivered a win for the plaintiff in Babb v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
" Champion v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 9:39 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 1:40 pm
See Marchand v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 10:09 am
” He would grant review “to determine whether the agency is operating within the confines of the authority granted by Congress. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 3:33 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Jasper Tran and Cameron Baker write that Allen v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
