Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 7021 - 7040 of 19,240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2012, 5:31 pm by joel
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, alleging trademark infringement, unfair competition, and violations of the Lanham Act, Common Law of the State of Michigan, and the Michigan Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 10:09 am by Gareth
The reference to the ECJ asks whether a prohibition issued by a Community trade mark court of a Member State has effect throughout the entire European Community or whether it becomes impotent at the rendering State’s borders. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Conference of State Legislators Blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Georgia v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:17 am
 There, as Case C 96/09 P Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Budějovický Budvar, described by the IPKat here, they were unceremoniously tossed back to the General Court for its further attention. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Auth. v Ennead Architects LLP, 148 AD3d 618, 618 [1st Dept 2017] [internal quotation marks omitted]; CPLR 214[6]). [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:51 am by Amy Howe
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in EPA v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
San, LLC v Zucker & Kwestel, LLP, 112 AD3d 796, 797 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Ginsburg Dev. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:33 am by Cormac Early
At Reason, Jacob Sullum discusses the questions about the constitutionality of warrantless electronic surveillance left open by United States v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am by INFORRM
On 3 May 2013, journalists, lawyers, academics and campaigners marked World Press Freedom Day. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The book points out that neither the Federalist nor other early commentaries used the word “interposition” and that the term did not even surface in state protests against Chisholm v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:05 pm by Saul Cornell
The majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]