Search for: "True v. United States" Results 7021 - 7040 of 9,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
If we look into the past (and not even the very distant past), the law in the United States considered girls and women to be highly valuable living property. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 2:57 pm by Russell Knight
” 740 ILCS 23/5(a)(2) “[T]ransgender individuals, fell squarely within section 5(a)” Johnson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 8:45 pm
Although the first prong of this two-prong test is not labeled as such, it is essentially the same type of inquiry as the "predominant purpose/secondary effects" test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in City of Renton v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:19 am by Anup Malani
United States, the defendant was arrested after trying to trade his machine gun for a bag of cocaine. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by SHG
The point is that an injunction against the United States cannot, ever, be “unconstitutional. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:05 am by George Croner
” While the Second Circuit noted in its decision in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The search at Mar-a-Lago for classified documents is now presented as a tipping point, an existential threat to the country that true patriots must thwart. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
It has long been established that someone's state of mind is not capable of being proven true or false. [read post]
1 May 2010, 11:37 pm by ZMan!
STRICT AND INTENSIVE SUPERVISION AND TREATMENT In the United States Supreme Court case of Kansas V. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
It is also ultra vires under well-established law.The seminal case applying the municipal cost recovery rule (sometimes also called the "free public services doctrine") is a sixty-year old Supreme Court case called United States v. [read post]