Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant" Results 7021 - 7040 of 9,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
Kappos (Patents Post Grant Blog) Marshall jury renders verdict in patent case: Convolve v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 9:52 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
This week the 9th Circuit heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:15 am by davidmginsberg
I can’t recall any adversary who was well respected that I did not get along with, at least on a professional level. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:03 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Remember that thing we used to call Neighbour nuisance before it got re-designated as a social disease by the Daily Mail? [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 2:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Therefore, Dalley's motion, in Motion Sequence No. 009, is granted only to the extent of granting summary judgment dismissing Harris's fourteenth cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress as asserted against him. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
  The editors here invited us to discuss the likelihood that the Supreme Court would grant the recently filed cert. petition out of the Sixth Circuit – or, presumably, appeals of any of the cases that will soon be on its doorstep – and, if it does, how it is likely to rule. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:59 am by Jenna Greene
For those of us who practice in this area, we will forever be in his debt. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm by David Kopel
Regarding conditional federal grants, in 1987 in South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
By Rebecca Tushnet and Eric GoldmanTrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:19 am by Steven Hansen
`(B) MEASUREMENT- For purposes of subparagraph (A)(iii), there is no measurable adverse effect on public health or safety if the exception described in subparagraph (A) will result in no measurable increase in blood lead levels of a child. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:08 am by David Fagundes
  Courts increasingly use as a touchstone of their factor one analysis whether the use is “transformative” of the work, following on an idea developed in an influential article by Judge Pierre Leval and elevated to the level of doctrine in the Supreme Court’s 1994 decision Campbell v. [read post]
So, not only should we abolish those pesky ALJs who are granting disability claims, but let's use those savings to review the decisions of those disability claimants who have already been granted benefits. [read post]