Search for: "United States of America v " Results 7021 - 7040 of 8,954
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2011, 8:37 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
"For the past 20-years, the congregation of the Westboro Baptist Church has picketed military funerals to communicate its belief that God hates the United States for its tolerance of homosexuality, particularly in America's military. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:00 am by Betsy McKenzie
Apparently in the text of the post (somewhere I don't see) Sugarman transmits letters from way back in 1997 on the matter of vendor neutral citation, in which Judge Posner, among others, gave their opinions to the Chairman of the Automation & Technology Committee Judicial Conference of the United States, who was preparing a rule on the matter of citation formats. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm by John Elwood
§  Amicus brief of the Specialty Wine Retailers of America Title: Felkner v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:01 am by Sam Conforti
Insider hacking reached 48% of overall hacking activity in the 2010 Data Breach Investigations Report by Verizon Business, an IP communications and information technology service, and the United States Secret Service (USSS). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:30 am by Nick Farr
Needless to say, any time the United States Supreme Supreme Court issues a case involving preemption, we here at Abnormal Use pay close attention. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 7:02 pm by Allie
  Even more interesting is the fact that the organizers of these events have ownership interests in several legal cases that have come before the Supreme Court, most recently Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christa Culver
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 8:08 am by brettb
Mazda Motor of America, Inc., the Supreme Court of the United States took a major step in defining the limits of federal preemption. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:59 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkOpinion Date: 2/16/11Cite: IBM Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:20 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  In the ID, ALJ Gildea determined that Samsung had not violated Section 337 in connection with the importation into the United States, sale for importation, or sale within the United States after importation of certain multi-layer ceramic capacitors by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 11:11 am by Ronald Mann
The amicus brief filed by the United States, by contrast, addresses the problem more directly. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Amanda Rice
United States and United States v. [read post]