Search for: "United States v. Justice" Results 7021 - 7040 of 32,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Kali Borkoski
Today in the Community we consider whether the Justices should (or will) grant cert. in Arizona v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:44 am by Cormac Early
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8), and United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 7:11 am by Viking
There is an interesting case going on in the Ninth, United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:50 am by Mary L. Dudziak
United States, 1949 (Roundtable)Chair: Ellen Schrecker, Yeshiva University Lisa Davis, Independent ScholarBarbara Falk, Canadian Forces College / RMCFred Jerome, Independent ScholarAmerican Slavery: Reinforcements and ReactionsPeter Wirzbicki, New York University, “Transcendentalism and the Fugitive Slave Act”Vanessa Varin, Louisiana State University, “Myth and Power: The Relationship Between Fiction and Capital Justice in the Early… [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
United States, a case pending in federal district court in New York challenging the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:30 am by Joe Consumer
Yet by the majority’s lights, the very act of creating that requirement in order to “safeguard the consumer,”  United  States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 11:27 am
At Tuesday’s oral argument in United Student Aid Funds v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:22 am by Sheldon Toplitt
The United States Supreme Court, in cases such as Press-Enterprise Co. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by JB
” Does this resolve the question of whether the President is an “officer of the United States. [read post]
24 May 2017, 11:52 am by admin
Midland Funding, the giant California-based debt buyer, narrowly escaped judgment in the United States Supreme Court in May 2017, when the nation’s highest justices ruled 5-3 that they couldn’t be sued by a bankrupt debtor for filing a stale claim — i.e. a claim involving a debt where the statute of limitations had expired — in her bankruptcy case. [read post]