Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 7041 - 7060 of 7,397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2016, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
The findings in Cooke hinted at an uphill battle for those seeking to pursue defamation claims. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court has recently agreed to resolve this matter, in the case of Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
These processes and are currently being utilized on a grand scale by groups referred to as “copyright trolls” (“troll”).v Unlike the prototypical ‘content owners versus file sharer’ battle that has heretofore been pursued, this revived model brings a new third party to the bargaining table. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am by Brandon Bartels
Sometime before commencement of the Supreme Court’s 2009 term, Mike Sacks, a third-year law student at Georgetown University, had an idea. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm by Xandra Kramer
This is admittedly a setback for the collective protection of privacy rights, notably similar to the one following the 2021 United Kingdom Supreme Court ruling in Lloyd v Google. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Samantha Barbas, Actual Malice:  Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:35 am by Anthony Gaughan
According to a new study in the International Journal of Police Science & Management, the number of states that require police officers to record custodial interrogations has risen from only 2 states in 2002 to 25 states in 2017. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:44 pm by Michael Grossman
” Delivering the majority decision in Voisine v United States, Justice Elena Kagan eloquently stated: “Reckless con­duct, which requires the conscious disregard of a known risk, is not an accident: It involves a deliberate decision to endanger another. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:16 am by charonqc
“The following seven paragraphs have been redacted [It was reported that a new series of interviews was conducted by the United States authorities prior to 17 May 2001 as part of a new strategy designed by an expert interviewer. v)  It was reported that at some stage during that further interview process by the United States authorities, BM had been intentionally subjected to continuous sleep deprivation. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 1:36 am by INFORRM
There seems to be little chance of IPSO finding such a breach, following its rulings in Littler v Sunday Express, and Elton-Campbell v Daily Mail. [read post]