Search for: "DOEs"
Results 7041 - 7060
of 546,314
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2024, 1:44 pm
Within that framework, “the statutory directive to grant relief when the district court ‘deems’ it ‘just and proper’ [does not] jettison the normal equitable rules. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 1:17 pm
How does your experience influence your approach to organizing? [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:58 pm
Introduction to ombudsperson: history, evolution and current mission; What the ombudsperson does on the campus; The intersection of the ombudsperson and the legal office: where their paths intersect and how the ombudsperson can work with the legal office; How the ombudsperson can work with the legal office in resolving internal disputes; and Trends: where is this heading? [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
United States both raise the question whether deception to induce a commercial exchange can constitute federal mail or wire fraud, even if the defendant does not intend to cause economic harm and the alleged victim receives the goods or services for which it paid. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:39 pm
Today's opinion doesn't recite the facts of the underlying offense in any detail, largely because the legal issue on appeal (precommitment custody credits as a applied to the maximum term of confinement) does not depend in the slightest on those facts. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm
Therefore, just because a state doesn’t specifically spell-out fees requirements in its statutes or regulations, it does not mean fees disclosures comply with states’ interpretations of the law. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:51 am
How does this cozy mystery tackle plagiarism? [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:15 am
EMTALA does not require doctors to perform abortions or provide abortion-related medical treatment over their conscience objections because EMTALA does not impose obligations on individual doctors. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:11 am
But, no matter the approach taken, we all agree that the names clause does not violate the First Amendment. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 10:59 am
Your insurance adjuster’s priority is protecting the insurance company, and while your insurance adjuster cannot mislead you (at least not legally), your insurance adjuster also does not have to provide you with the information you need to assert your legal rights effectively. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 10:58 am
Simply put, a President who does not want to follow the appropriations laws by spending exactly what Congress ordered him to spend (in full and on time) impounds funds when he says, "Nuh uh, not gonna do it. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 10:41 am
Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) chimed in enthusiastically, “Does any witness here want to defend the current code? [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 10:29 am
., be sure that the quote is accurate and does not omit any pertinent language. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 10:11 am
The PWFA provides the minimum standards for compliance and does not preempt applicable state or local law. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 10:08 am
This article is for informational purposes only and does not contain or convey legal advice. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 10:00 am
Does Renting Your Second Home Affect Your Taxes? [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:53 am
| O'Flaherty Law - Learn About Law Legal Articles, Videos & Podcasts with O'Flaherty Law [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:43 am
§ 1052(c), does not violate the First Amendment. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:38 am
(Such transparency has become increasingly important over the years given the cottage industry of PTAB conspiracy theorists, which is certainly not lost on the agency) The SOP update (here), explains in relevant part: The SOP does not include a procedure for panel expansion, a process that was discontinued in 2018 Clarification of conflict of interest procedures for judges Explanation of judge jurisdiction (ex parte only, etc.) [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:32 am
So the Committee’s argument was two-fold: First, Colorado II does not control its facial challenge because the facts and legal landscape have developed since 2001, including Congress amending the Act in 2014; second, based on the footnote, Colorado II explicitly welcomes its as-applied challenge because it only held the regulation was not unconstitutional in every application. [read post]
