Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 7041 - 7060
of 7,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2008, 3:48 pm
In the absence of English translation of foreign language documents filing mistakes can happen. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 11:02 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Misty Dawn Boyer v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
At least Churchill knew how to flick a good 'V sign'... as, indeed, did the English archers at Agincourt] And… on that note.. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:23 am
I mentioned yesterday the new case in the High Court of England and Wales regarding software patents, Symbian Ltd v Comptroller General Of Patents. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 12:05 pm
He stated that: "To the mind of the English lawyer ... such a marriage is perceived as exploitative and indeed abusive. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:51 am
Inv. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:47 pm
The Court will distance itself from U.S. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:27 pm
Millemann of Weintraub Genshlea Chediak in the firm's IP Law Blog State found liable for beating on UT campus - Tennessee lawyer John Day of Day & Blair in his blog, Day on Torts ESOPs and company stock matches to 401(k): the Bear Stearns lesson - Lancaster attorney Michael Moore of Russell Krafft & Gruber in the firm's Pennsylvania Employment Law Blog Government reply briefly field with Supreme Court in Murphy v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 2:18 pm
"Get Blawgworld 2007 at Technolawyer.TechnoLlama in several postings is currently discussing ISP liability and the issue of ISP police in Sweden.The Technology & Marketing Law Blog by Eric Goldman also covers the Craigslist case and has some interesting insights on trademark law as a weapon at Lifestyle Lift Tries to Use TM Law to Shut Down User Discussions; Website Countersues for Shilling--Lifestyle Lift v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
Again, history is brought to bear to support the conclusions stated in the two sides’ conflicting briefs. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:53 am
The issue in Michael Wilson Partners Ltd v John Forster Emmott [2008] EWCA Civ 184 was whether Mr Justice Flaux, at first instance, had acted correctly in authorising the disclosure, for the purposes of proceedings in New South Wales and the British Virgin Islands, of documents generated in an English arbitration. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A person could not be extradited to the United States of America to stand trial on charges brought under US legislation which declared cartels to be illegal, to stand trial for price-fixing offences alleged to have been committed from 1989 to 2000 because during that period price-fixing agreements and cartels were not illegal under English law, unless there were other aggravating… [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:44 am
The policy stated that "7. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16; WLR (D) 81 “During the period from 1989 to 2000 price fixing was not illegal under English law so that it was not an extradition offence for the purposes of s 137 of the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
The parent company of the group is an English company, based in Windsor. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
" This ancient truism, thought to have its origins in Roman law, was eventually folded into the American legal system through the early English colonialists. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
" This ancient truism, thought to have its origins in Roman law, was eventually folded into the American legal system through the early English colonialists. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
State,272 Ga. 540 (1) (533 SE2d 60) (2000); State of Ga. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 4:55 am
The English courts have often given such clauses a fairly narrow construction. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO upholds one of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF’s) human stem cell patents (decisions are pending on two other patents): (IPKat), (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), English High Court rules Qualcomm’s patents invalid in battle against Nokia: (Philip Brooks),… [read post]
