Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges" Results 7041 - 7060 of 9,823
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2011, 9:21 am by Bill Callison
  Practical stuff is evanescent and can be learned and re-learned, but theoretical skill lasts. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 8:21 pm by Ken
We’re the good guys; they are the bad guys. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:34 pm
In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943, 956 (Fed. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:26 pm by Louis Leichter
Such hearings can be held with little or no notice to the licensee and are decided by a three-member panel of the Board rather than an independent administrative law judge. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:30 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
All submissions will be reviewed by judges from Facebook, ASPR, FEMA, and the New Orleans Health Commissioner. [read post]
Congress weakened the laws designed to protect our privacy, while the executive branch secretly re-interprets or simply ignores the law with no consequence. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:07 am by South Florida Lawyers
If you're like me and you like to waste hours reading about broken yacht cases and whether you need to "meet and confer" before telling a federal judge that opposing counsel is a big fat liar, the costs of entertaining yourself just went up:The judicial conference, Sentelle said, today also increased miscellaneous fees for federal courts, a move designed to create an estimated $10.5 million in additional revenue for fiscal year 2012.The panel approved a fee… [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 8:07 am by Matt C. Bailey
Further, judges are accountable to the public in ways that arbitrators are not, so Broughton stated that judges are more suitable for overseeing injunctive remedies designed for public protection. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 1:36 pm by David Lat
”But so are federal judges, and so is the DOJ Honors Program. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:58 am by Russ Bensing
  It may be that the best the appellate can do is set the outer limits; if you’re going to win a case on an issue like this, you’re going to do it at trial, or not at all. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 12:18 pm by John Richards
I guess you can’t judge someone based solely on their public persona. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am by Marie Louise
(IAM)   United Kingdom EWHC (Admin) holds defendant’s acquisition of illegally copied audio files would constitute an offence under s. 329 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002: Sitek v Circuit Court of Swidnica (1709 Copyright Blog) IPO – Original Bucks Fizz members lose trade mark battle over name (Out-Law) (IPKat) Should the UK facilitate online filing of registered design applications? [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 3:20 pm by Nathan
 The judge’s job is to make rulings of law. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 11:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
And we’re forced to contort the law enforcement approach when we attempt to make it answer and deal with questions it was never designed to deal with. [read post]