Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 7041 - 7060
of 18,112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2017, 10:08 am
Last month marked the 214th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Marbury v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Attorney General of Canada re Health Canada for $90,100.55 + punitive damages of $25,000; T-132-17 Blacklock’s v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:37 pm
In Lachaux -v- Lachaux [2017] EWHC 385 (Fam) Mr Justice Mostyn considered the guidance in relation to issues between (it transpired) former husband and wife. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 1:06 pm
Justices agreed with the trial court’s application of the 1995 court ruling, which resulted in a legal doctrine that is now referred to as the “McHaffie Rule” (after the case of McHaffie v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
That is, we argue here, what we’re seeing now. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:25 am
Grant of declarations (paras 343-418 of Judgment)The Claimants had to demonstrate that the declarations sought would serve a useful purpose, and that they should be granted taking into consideration justice to the Claimants, justice to the Defendants, and any special reasons as to why the Court should grant the declaration. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:35 am
Personally, I have been very interested in it for a while [see here], and so has been apparently the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
The executive order, which is the first step in what is expected to be a very lengthy process to rewrite the rule, instructs EPA to rewrite the rule so that the definition of navigable waters is consistent with the standard set out by Justice Scalia in the 2006 case Rapanos v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:19 am
In Gordon v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:20 am
Sparks were not flying yesterday in the argument in Coventry Health Care v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:27 am
This lack of discussion re the “expressive” nature of a challenged work is not new. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:35 am
It has now been more than a year since Justice Antonin Scalia passed away, but his jurisprudential spirit seemed to fill the courtroom yesterday as the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Dean v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 11:55 am
” See Reed v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am
Today the court hears oral argument in Dean v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:14 pm
If you’re interested in a more thorough analysis, you can see my old congressional testimony on the subject — or, better yet, review Justice Antonin Scalia’s opinion in D.C. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
| The next round of Cartier: UK Supreme Court will hear appeal re costs of intermediary injunctions | New National IP Strategic Action Plan in China | Full decision of Enlarged Board of Appeal in partial priority / poisonous divisionals referral (G01/15) published | INGRES Conference Part II - Trade Secret, Copyright, Design and Trade Mark Law Developments | 5 mistakes to avoid in IP student essays ... and not only there | INGRES Conference Part I - European Patent Law Developments |… [read post]
