Search for: "In re T. M. R." Results 7041 - 7060 of 22,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2013, 9:43 am by Asher Bearman
Readers may feel free to re-post this content elsewhere as well. [read post]
19 May 2013, 10:39 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Considérant, en premier lieu, que, par les dispositions du second alinéa de l’article 202-1 du code civil dans sa rédaction résultant du paragraphe II de l’article 1er de la loi déférée, le législateur a entendu introduire un dispositif spécifique selon lequel « deux personnes de même sexe peuvent contracter mariage lorsque, pour au moins l’une d’elles, soit sa loi… [read post]
19 May 2013, 10:29 am by Jeff Foust
I’m not sure the resources are there. [read post]
17 May 2013, 2:41 pm by Dave Wieneke
Whether we notice it or not, we’re being measured. [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:41 am by Ron Coleman
  The thing about consensus is that you can’t ask for it if you’re going to propose a foundation of “principles” predicated on lies and half truths. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
La totalité des requêtes présentées en recours avaient été soumises avec le mémoire de recours, et différaient de celles présentées en première instance. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:35 am by Joe Consumer
 I’m not even talking about Eric Holder. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:30 am by Dennis Crouch
“[T]he purchaser of the [patented] machine . . . does not acquire any right to construct another machine either forhis own use or to be vended to another. [read post]
10 May 2013, 12:19 pm by Lowell Brown
“Now that they’ve got it, they don’t want to lose their momentum. [read post]
9 May 2013, 11:32 am by Ron Coleman
No, I’m getting old myself, you know; and I says it’s INTA and I say it “inta. [read post]
8 May 2013, 3:05 pm by Jean Braucher
  Watt responded, “I’m looking forward to going to sit with Sen. [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:48 am by Gene Quinn
You don’t want them so broad that they’re killed with prior art. [read post]