Search for: "Judge v. United States"
Results 7041 - 7060
of 35,340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2011, 6:42 am
In Brantley v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:52 pm
And speaking of spice, that was also the subject of today’s AFCCA argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 1:43 pm
Yesterday we discussed the case of United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:35 pm
The Court of Appeal affirms.The best case for the plaintiff was probably a Ninth Circuit case, applying California law, that held that the United States was liable for the sexual assault by an immigration officer on an applicant for asylum. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
United States, 556 U.S. 646, 647, 655–56 (2009); United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 7:52 pm
Oral arguments are also expected on trial discovery orders.The hearing is scheduled for 2 p.m. in United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York before Hon. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 5:12 pm
By Nicholas Ulrich A year ago, the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
In a similar vein, we are thankful for the helpful briefing and argument we received from the United States as amicus curiae. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 3:02 pm
Issued February 5, 2007 -- Opinion of Judge Andre M. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 8:45 pm
Bush and Hamdan v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 5:43 am
-patented article abroad, does not authorize the buyer to import the article and sell and use it in the United States, which are infringing acts absent authority from the patentee. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:11 am
The United States attorney representing the Post Office, S. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:46 pm
The February 23, 2011 Court of Appeals opinion in Reiss v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:15 pm
Third, it is a decision of the Section of the Court which deals with United Kingdom cases (the President of the Fourth Section is the UK judge, Sir Nicholas Bratza) and shows the approach likely to be taken in UK applications raising these issues. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 11:23 am
Prot. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 8:20 pm
This post discusses recent orders by the Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) who preside over the investigations of (a) one of Ericsson's three ITC complaints against Apple and (b) Apple's sole countercomplaint. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:24 am
(State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:32 pm
”[16] The Decision in Martoma In United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:16 am
The District Court Judge then pointed out that the Government complied with the Court's order by providing a declaration from Robert Patterson, an Assistant Special Agent in Charge at the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (`DEA’), which the Government initially filed ex parte and under seal and later filed publicly in redacted form. [read post]
