Search for: "Michaels v State"
Results 7041 - 7060
of 13,662
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2010, 9:08 am
The decision requires twenty-four states to repeal their bans on corporate and union advertising; as states repeal these laws, Baran reasoned, they might concurrently strengthen their reporting and disclosure laws. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
(Houseman v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:01 pm
ShareMind-reading police officers, guns made of marshmallows, and a Woody Allen mockumentary all made rhetorical appearances during Tuesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 1:26 pm
In 1928 Justice Louis Brandeis, writing in dissent in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:57 am
Echostar en banc decision stands (Patently-O) (IPBiz) CAFC confirms Odom’s patent invalid: Gary Odom v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:47 am
Berk & Michaels, 192 A.D.2d at 348 (1st Dept. 1993) (stating that a “pleading must assert more than simply an extended general relationship between the professional and client … in that the facts are required to demonstrate continued representation in the specific matter directly under dispute”) (internal citations omitted). [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 10:20 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Michael L. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:37 pm
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; and Justin A. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 3:57 am
State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:46 pm
’s Bancroft represents the state attorneys general, and Michael Carvin of Jones Day is counsel to the NFIB. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:25 am
The Superior Court ruled against the Mercer County NJ prosecutor by stating that the 20-minute observation rule was required by State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 4:03 am
Hamdi v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:12 am
First up is California Solicitor General Michael Mongan, on behalf of the intervenor states seeking to defend the ACA, stressing that the individual mandate does not operate as a mandate, but rather offers a choice, as the Court had concluded in NFIB v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:25 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf responds to a recent essay by Senator Ted Cruz on Bond v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
(ContentAgenda) Scotland Franz Ferdinand sends Web-Sheriff after pirates (TorrentFreak) (Techdirt) Singapore Sony Ericsson to be first in Singapore to sell major-label music files without DRM (ContentAgenda) Sweden Pirate Bay’s tour bus to become court case press centre (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom UK censors responses to piracy consultation (TorrentFreak) Framlingham College wins cybersquatting case against Canadian domain parkers Realm… [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 1:58 pm
The $1 billion payout covers claims against Michael Dell, other Dell directors, Silver Lake, as well as Goldman Sachs. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:28 pm
Mr Justice Eder held that the correct approach was that the present legislation is presumed valid but, as stated by Lord Goff in Kirklees BC v Wickes Building Supplies Ltd [1993] AC 227, the existence of the alleged defence is to be taken into account in the exercise of the court’s discretion [paragraph 78]. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
In Smith v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 5:50 pm
McGinnis & Michael B. [read post]
