Search for: "STATE v. BROWN"
Results 7041 - 7060
of 8,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2023, 8:40 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit applied the test outlined by Justice Anthony Kennedy in Rapanos v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 7:08 pm
Supreme Court’s June 23, 2011 landmark decision in PLIVA Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:18 am
White (Vanderbilt University), on Friday, October 8, 2021 Tags: Capital allocation, Executive Compensation, Liquidity, Market conditions, Repurchases, Shareholder value SEC Form 10-K Comments Regarding Climate-Related Disclosures Posted by Brian V. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
I was perfectly content with my life until Jeremy suggested that I blog about the United States Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) Harry Winston v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:14 pm
Without embracing the equation made in Reynolds v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 11:38 am
R and A Synergy LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 1:58 pm
The same goes for review of state and local legislation; there you have to talk about the possibility of congressional legislation to preempt bad stuff – freed of the constraint of City of Boerne v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:50 am
In Beaumont-Jacques v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:03 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:25 am
This is what the General Court concluded, referring to Case T-418/07 LIBRO v OHIM – Causley (LiBRO), and confirming the approach adopted in Specsavers. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:00 am
These limits will deter the kind of recalcitrance associated with massive resistance to desegregation that the Supreme Court invited with the “all deliberate speed” formulation of Brown v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 4:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 9:18 am
In a 1999 roundtable discussion, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court, suggested that United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:14 pm
By a 3-2 majority their Lordships (Lords Hope, Carswell and Brown) held that she was not habitually resident (Baroness Hale and Lord Neuberger dissenting). [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:13 am
From Myers v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
See Brown v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:18 am
Brown, No. 1 CA-CV 13-0138 (Az, Ct. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
United States—the “honest services” case—has “no impact whatsoever” on its prosecution of Ring. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 7:09 am
Only after “building blocks” like this one were in place did Marshall argue in Brown v. [read post]
29 May 2025, 7:59 am
Here is the majority’s entire justification of this mandatory disclosure: In light of those conclusions, however, the Court still faces the simultaneous challenge of enabling attorneys to advertise using the most state-of-the-art technology while protecting the interests of the public, the integrity of our profession, and the administration of justice. [read post]
