Search for: "State v Cooper" Results 7041 - 7060 of 8,568
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
The detective’s statements during questioning that he did not believe the juvenile was telling the entire truth and that this was the juvenile’s last opportunity to cooperate were not coercive and did not alter this conclusion. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:05 am by Jasmin Mujanović
Serbia is a fully recognized State with representation in all leading intergovernmental bodies, from the United Nations to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe to INTERPOL. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/287556.con.doc.pdf State v . [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
Another, indirect, pathway focuses on the support of key stakeholders to whom human rights related work has been given (by the state) or taken (in the absence of delegation). [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:22 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
In this regard, in its judgment of 12 December 2013 (case C-493/12, Eli Lilly v Human Genome Sciences), the CJEU made the following observations: “30. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 10:30 pm by Roos Klomberg
However, although the Court increasingly delineates the boundaries of the principle of mutual trust, this principle remains crucial for the efficient cooperation between Member States to prevent impunity (See Rizcallah p. 2). [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm by Jesse Peters
  The ICJ Order in South Africa v Israel On 26 January 2024, the ICJ delivered its landmark Order indicating provisional measures in South Africa v Israel. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:28 pm by Adeline Chong
Service out pursuant to a contractual agreement In NW Corp Pte Ltd v HK Petroleum Enterprises Cooperation Ltd,[17] the contract between the claimant and defendant, who were Singapore and Hong Kong-incorporated companies respectively, contained this clause: ‘This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the English law [sic]. [read post]