Search for: "Summers v. Summers"
Results 7041 - 7060
of 9,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2010, 2:15 am
“The trial will be heard in the High Court before the summer, which is essentially when it would be heard in the Patents County Court. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 5:56 pm
The high court rejected Wiggins’ constitutional challenges, citing its earlier decision this year in Hollie v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:20 am
He signed onto Roe v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
The most recent lawyer-president to do so was Richard Nixon when he argued the case of Time v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
Even the most controversial Supreme Court decision in recent memory, the Bush v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 12:49 pm
Last summer, three Justices said the Supreme Court should consider important but undecided issues left over from a 2008 ruling on the rights of individuals detained by the U.S. military — the unanimous ruling in Munaf v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 11:08 am
QFS Scaffolding Ltd v Sable & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 682 For those who can tear themselves away from the Supreme Court we offer this case which we somehow missed from the summer (possibly due to too many holidays!). [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 6:47 am
Image via WikipediaIn U.S. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:11 pm
By contrast, Congress doesn’t have a veto in ordinary rulemaking and adjudication by agencies (cases like INS v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm
Ahanchian v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:41 am
Since starting her own law firm, she has helped to litigate another ATS case, as well as the post-9/11 lawsuit captioned José Padilla v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
and Crichton v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:26 am
In the summer of 1995, Cameco began construction of a mine in Kyrgyzstan. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 8:48 am
In the summer of 1995, Cameco began construction of a mine in Kyrgyzstan. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 8:29 am
Seed Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 10:47 pm
In today’s case (Rothenbusch v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 12:37 pm
According to one appellate court in California, the answer seems to be yes.RIS Media reported today on a California appellate court decision earlier this week (Holmes v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:11 pm
This summer a federal judge declared DOMA unconstitutional in two different cases. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:19 pm
Because it seems judges on the Maryland Court of Appeals are getting into the game.A reader dug up a case from this summer involving whether or not the state met the burden of proof necessary to show that a pot smoker “possessed” a blunt he wasn’t physically holding at the time.The court ruled that he did, and analogized the situation to a Cheech and Chong movie.I’m not sure if it was the decision or the dated reference which enraged the other side, but the… [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:14 am
See, Kahn v. [read post]
