Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 7041 - 7060 of 21,971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2009, 1:52 am
As usual, the Conte Bros. test is either trivial, creating only opportunities for error, or misses the point. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:19 pm by Jay Shepherd
The plaintiffs in the case did not file their EEOC claims within 300 days of the testing procedure's creation. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 10:57 am
While state court procedures and juries may seem more hospitable to plaintiffs, the ultimate backdrop in Texas is review by the Texas Supreme Court which has shown it is not adverse to reversing jury verdicts. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:22 am by Lyle Roberts
May 9, 2017), the plaintiffs claimed that the company “knew that the drug they were testing would fail long before that information was released to the public. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 3:00 am
  Marso involves a medical malpractice case where the plaintiff's expert witness on causation at trial, testified that all other possibilities for causation of the stroke were excluded by testing. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 1:09 am by Pierce & Thornton, PLC
A Nurse Practitioner ordered a urine culture and sensitivity test. [read post]
2 May 2009, 12:59 am
-Reasonable expectation test: Examines whether an object found in food ought to have been anticipated by the consumer.The trend is towards the Reasonable Expectation test in most jurisdictions.The warranty of merchantability is implied in all contracts - unless explicitly disclaimed - for the sale of goods made by a merchant. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 10:04 am by Ashby Jones
The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear the plaintiffs’ appeal, letting stand a ruling from the Federal Circuit in 2009 approving the dismissal of the plaintiffs’ suit. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 1:09 am by Pierce & Thornton, PLC
A Nurse Practitioner ordered a urine culture and sensitivity test. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 1:09 am by Pierce & Thornton, PLC
A Nurse Practitioner ordered a urine culture and sensitivity test. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:08 am
County of Nassau, the Second Circuit held that the defendant's decision to pick from among 25 different tests the test that had the smallest disparate impact on black workers did not violate the statutory or constitutional rights of white and Latino plaintiffs. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:59 am by Marty Schwimmer
Noting that this test is not a ‘mechanical device’ but a ‘rough guide and ‘checklist,’ the Second Circuit affirms the lower court’s decision to not stay in a counterfeiting case. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:13 pm
Towns states the books were not not turned over to the plaintiffs in the lawsuits. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:01 am
After a review of the administrative record, the trial court dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 8:53 am
  Assessing the district court's application of the traditional four-factor test considered when injunctions are requested, the court held the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the plaintiff did not make a "strong showing" of likelihood of success on the merits, and that the balance of equities did not favor the plaintiff. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:30 pm
In this case, the plaintiff alleges that the man’s pain was misdiagnosed and that tests were inaccurately interpreted as well. [read post]