Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 7041 - 7060
of 55,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
Aug. 29, 2004) (noting that the trial court had upheld a narrowly drawn criminal libel statute; the defendant did not argue the First Amendment on appeal); People v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 4:51 am
In the Oklahoma State University case, Arista v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 3:24 pm
” In support of their argument, the plaintiffs cited Texas v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:03 am
We need a new specialty in election law, so that people are as likely to claim expertise in the electoral reform process as they are in campaign finance or districting. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 12:24 am
You'd be surprised what some people do. [read post]
28 Jul 2005, 10:20 pm
We had previously discussed in this post the First Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:48 am
Most people are I think familiar with the Snyder v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 4:21 pm
., its applicability to lawful permanent residents). [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 2:44 pm
We generally stay or dismiss lawsuits filed in our forum in that situation in favor of alternative litigation in Country X.Except when Country X is Iran.The Court of Appeal notes that Iran might look like a regular civil law country. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:01 am
The funny video captures people’s anger at this hateful law. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:11 pm
People v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 8:49 am
The email was sent to him by John Flynn, a law professor at the University of Utah and his co-author on a soon-to-be published casebook on antitrust law. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:09 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:19 am
In Arista v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
The FX television network’s The People v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 3:36 pm
Our friends at People For the American Way send us this: Senator Edward Kennedy and a bipartisan group of fourteen of his colleagues have introduced the Fair Pay Restoration Act to vastly reduce the damage done by the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Ledbetter v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:15 pm
Ilya Shapiro at Cato: In its ruling today in Riley v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 1:34 pm
You must comply with a new law that was just passed, but doing so means you are probably violating one of our patents. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 1:04 am
Subscription Required
BRONX COUNTYCriminal Practice
Prosecutors Granted Lineup; Defendant Granted Double Blind, But Not Sequential Lineup
People v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm
”[4]Supporters of segregation made “appeals to natural law, divine law, and unchanging moral principles in [their] opposition” to the CRA[5] and argued “there were decent, sincere people on both sides. [read post]
