Search for: "U. N. N." Results 7041 - 7060 of 7,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2011, 3:15 am by Maxwell Kennerly
§ 101, which says “[n]o court of the United States . . . shall have jurisdiction to issue any . . . temporary or permanent injunction in a case involving or growing out of a labor dispute, except in strict conformity with the provisions of this chapter. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:05 am by Brian Finucane
(emphasis added) (U) Additional information relevant to this reporting period is provided in the classified annex. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm by Bernard Bell
May an agency revive a defunct rulemaking without notice, and then immediately promulgate a lightly revised version of the proposed rule as a final rule? [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
We've done so many posts on removal - for you non-lawyers that means moving cases that were originally filed in state court into federal court - that even we have a hard time keeping track. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 8:10 pm by Bill Marler
.: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6250a3.htm; Buchholz, U., Bernard, H., Werber, D., Böhmer, M. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 12:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
"[U]nder the pressure of great dangers," constitutional rights may be reasonably restricted "as the safety of the general public may demand. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:18 pm
Introduction Part I and Part II of this series reviewed the historical background and technology of food irradiation, and the food safety implications relating to FDA’s recent approval of a new rule for use of ionizing irradiation as a processing step in fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
[The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?] [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 12:09 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
The DMLP blog has been on an unplanned break for a while as a result of the Boston Marathon bombings and subsequent manhunt. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:00 am by Marty Lederman
., 1897); see also Letter from Jefferson to Edward Livingston (Nov. 1, 1801), in id. at 57, 58 n.1 (“if [the President] sees a prosecution put into a train which is not lawful, he may order it to be discontinued”).)The draft McGahn memo, however, also identified at least three other important limits on the President's power with regard to federal criminal law enforcement. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Back in 2009 – when the blog was still a Bexis/Herrmann operation – we wrote a catch-all punitive damages post entitled (oddly enough) “On Punitive Damages. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 8:48 am
The other day, I did a quick post in a pique of anger at the US criticizing China's Human Rights record while Barack Obama was travelling in or to Saudia Arabia and Egypt. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
., 69 F.3d 512, 517 n.8 (Fed. [read post]