Search for: "U.S. v. Washington"
Results 7041 - 7060
of 11,819
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2013, 2:13 pm
Last month the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington handed down a landmark rate-setting decision in a Microsoft v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 1:47 pm
For more on Dockery v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 11:02 am
Govplace, No. 07-cv-719-RCL, 2013 U.S. [read post]
29 May 2013, 2:38 pm
The new case, Linchpins of Liberty v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:51 am
” The editorial boards of the Washington Times and Investor’s Business Daily urge the Court to grant review in Sears v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:00 am
Grisinger recounts a failed attempt by civil rights lawyers to disrupt the cozy understandings of agency lawyers and the members of Washington law firms in the 1960s.Karen Tani will be presenting "Administering Citizenship: The 'Indian Problem' in the Age of the Federal Grant" as part of the panel "State v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 5:30 am
99% Infringing… http://t.co/24vLFPEtJu -> Washington State Passes Social Networking Privacy Legislation http://t.co/oLRiRIuaFc -> Making social networks remediate defamation enabled by their platforms: McKeogh v Facebook: A recent Irish cas… http://t.co/YYPAjpImvI -> Google's Eric Schmidt Says Hollywood's 'Storytelling Wins' in 'The New Digital Age' http://t.co/6puWKdM9R2 -> Keen On … Antitrust: Why Startup Entrepreneurs Should Fear Google… [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:23 pm
May 24: In the U.S. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:20 am
U.S. [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:22 pm
The case is U.S. ex rel O’Donnell v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 2:50 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 8:39 am
LEXIS 74014 (WD WA, May 24, 2013), a Washington federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2013 U.S. [read post]
24 May 2013, 9:00 am
Today we've learned that the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2013, 7:19 am
Yesterday Noel Canning, a Yakima, Washington, bottling company, filed its brief in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 10:00 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:31 am
In the Microsoft case it was key that the FRAND contract case had been brought in the United States approximately eight months before Motorola filed the related German lawsuits, and Motorola had offered, in a letter sent from Illinois to Washington State in 2010, a worldwide license covering its declared-essential H.264 and IEEE 802.11 patents, also listing the European counterparts of the relevant U.S. patents. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:31 pm
Court of Appeals decision (Brunner v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:03 pm
Washington D.C. -- The U.S. [read post]
20 May 2013, 11:53 am
The breach-of-contract and related damages issues in the Microsoft v. [read post]
19 May 2013, 1:06 am
U.S. [read post]
