Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 7041 - 7060
of 9,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
(v) in the absence of a good reason to make any other order the fall back is to make no order as to costs. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
(v) in the absence of a good reason to make any other order the fall back is to make no order as to costs. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 4:59 am
Winters v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
” See: Gomes v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:29 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:54 pm
We don’t care when the crisis revisits us. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:53 am
LaRoque v Holder (2011) advances a similar assertion and was recently granted standing by the U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 5:26 am
” The court, using previous case law, determined that the Register had failed to considered BREAKOUT’s artistic merits on the same level as it would other forms of art.In an earlier Supreme Court case entitled Feist Pub’lns, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:53 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:29 am
The Gap, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
On a more technical level, the government argued that Cusumano v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
Artistic works of art (sculpture and works of artistic craftsmanship) have the fullest protection; then come works with “eye appeal” (AMP Inc v Utilux Pty Ltd [1971] FSR 572); and under Part III of the 1988 Act a modest level of protection has been extended to purely functional objects (the exhaust system of a motor car being the familiar example). [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:43 am
Update | Thomas v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:26 pm
Call us, we are here to help! [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:26 am
A patent grants the patentee the right to exclude others from making, using, selling, offering to sell or importing the patented invention into the United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:26 am
A patent grants the patentee the right to exclude others from making, using, selling, offering to sell or importing the patented invention into the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:26 am
CSX Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:35 am
Insider Trading: Cuban Loses Unclean Hands Defense It's been a while since we heard of a development in the insider trading case, SEC v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
Highlights of the past six months include: Finalizing the Whistleblower Rules of the Dodd-Frank Act; The first use of a deferred prosecution agreement; The first use of the authority granted under the Dodd-Frank Act to pursue penalties against unregistered persons in administrative proceedings; Continued emphasis on cases related to the financial crisis; Continued application of the Sarbanes-Oxley “clawback” remedy; Continued focus on insider… [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:56 am
Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
