Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 7041 - 7060
of 9,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2011, 1:33 pm
In Leader v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:43 pm
In Boykins v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:47 am
As Moncrieffe v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:42 am
A terrible joke for a serious issue that has plagued the US farming community and US courts for years – most recently in an appeal from the Southern District of Indiana to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") in the case of Monsanto v Bowman. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:08 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:58 pm
In the case before the Supreme Court, U.S. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
United States, where the high court narrowed the scope of honest services fraud criminal conduct, gutted part of Scanlon’s plea arrangement with prosecutors. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
Barney Greengrass, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
Kammen invoked Witherspoon v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:27 pm
Kammen cites Cuyler v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
Connex-Metalna Management Consulting GmbH, 302 F.3d 358, 365 (5th Cir. 2002) (quoting United Parcel Service, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:31 am
A 'pragmatic' test has been applied to make this determination-analyzing 'whether the facts are related in time, space, origin, or motivation, whether they form a convenient trial unit, and whether their treatment as a unit conforms to the parties' expectations or business understanding or usage' " (Xiao Yang Chen v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:59 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit confirms that (in appropriate cases) motions to strike can be used to obtain early rulings on certification. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
Petition for certiorari Amicus brief of America’s Health Insurance Plans Amicus brief of Landmark Legal Foundation Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Amicus brief of Family Research Council Harvey v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm
The due process guarantees in the United States and New York Constitutions require that a defendant be afforded notice of the hearing to determine his or her risk level pursuant to SORA and a meaningful opportunity to respond to the risk level assessment (see § 168-n [3]; People v David W., 95 NY2d 130, 136-140). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Remote sellers are exempt from collection obligations if they have less than $500,00 per year in sales in the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 5:27 pm
Yesterday's oral argument at the United States Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
(United States v. [read post]
