Search for: "United States v. California" Results 7041 - 7060 of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
NAC was found liable on a breach of contract claim in an underlying action against it in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by WIMS
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:14 pm by WIMS
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:41 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Nonimmigrants in valid V-1 or V-2/V-3 status or K-3/K-4 status who have an I-485 application pending also do not need advance parole. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm by Justin Silverman
United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971) (refusing to stop the publication of classified documents about U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War);  Florida Star v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm by Justin Silverman
United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971) (refusing to stop the publication of classified documents about U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War);  Florida Star v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 4:39 am
Selected items by law firms recently posted on the InternetSource: Lexology in cooperation with the Association of Corporate Counsel[Click on caption to access item posted on the Internet]Court, not arbitrator, decides contract formation question in the arbitration contextKelley Drye & Warren LLPAlfred Janiga has lived and worked in the United States for over 20 years since his arrival from Poland.Washington - Washington court holds statute of limitations doesn't apply to… [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 10:33 am by John Floyd
United States applied the Brady Rule to impeachment evidence. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am by Amy Howe
There is still more coverage of and commentary on United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:35 am by Goldberg Segalla LLP
(United States District Court, Southern District California, December 9, 2009)   This action arises from a dispute between the parties over their obligations under two reinsurance contracts. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:35 pm by Andrew Crocker
That’s the rule the Fourth Circuit reached in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 1:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
She and perhaps as many as one million other people, listened to speeches made by the President of the United States and other important persons. [read post]