Search for: "United States v. Little" Results 7041 - 7060 of 10,415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
  Our mission is to show that originalism leads to Justice Ginsburg’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:31 am by Giles Peaker
The unit must also be comparable in terms of quality and type. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 3:01 pm
Litton Indus., Inc., 410 Mass. 15, 23 (1991); Columbia State Bank v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:30 am by David Pozen
  Last fall, President Trump announced he was preparing an executive order that would deny birthright citizenship to children born in the United States to parents unlawfully in the country, notwithstanding the Justice Department’s consistent stance that such a move would violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause. [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:30 am by INFORRM
Some of the background can be found in an article entitled “Right of Reply: A Comparative Approach“  by Andras Koltay, who also discusses the position in the United States and Canada. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
Some of the background can be found in an article entitled “Right of Reply: A Comparative Approach“  by Andras Koltay, who also discusses the position in the United States and Canada. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
(IAM)   United Kingdom Coexistence and the Omega saga: Omega Engineering Inc v Omega SA and others (IPKat) When picking a vaccum cleaner design, watch for the sucker punch... [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:58 pm by Amy Howe
  The Justices did not make us wait:  the first opinion of the day came in United States v. [read post]