Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 7041 - 7060 of 10,066
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Law360 (subscription required), retired state-court judge George Eskin urges the justices to review Lacaze v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:51 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Circuit Court Interprets the Jury Selection & Service Act’s Provision Regarding Inspection of Jury Summoning Records In United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:30 am by Jay Willis
The Washington Post has an editorial discussing the Schumer-Van Hollen legislative response to Citizens United. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The last half century has witnessed extraordinary, almost unimaginable, changes in how Americans think about the death penalty.Fifty years ago, in 1972, the United States Supreme Court brought a temporary halt to capital punishment in Furman v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm by Liz Campbell
Surveillance is of critical importance in the investigation of serious and organised crime, in determining the extent and patterns of criminal behaviour, and in the gathering of evidence to construct a case against a suspect; thus it has been described as one of the most important legal weapons deployed by the United States against Mafia groups and families (see Jacobs, Busting the Mob: United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 6:15 am by Shahid Buttar
Edgar Hoover presided over a reign of intimidation and terror across Washington. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Washington and Colorado Department of State v Baca—unanimously upholding the power of a state to punish and replace members of the state’s contingent in the so-called Electoral College who fail to cast their votes for the candidate who won the state’s popular-election contest for President—weren’t particularly persuasive. [read post]