Search for: "1-8 Doe" Results 7061 - 7080 of 32,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2015, 6:16 am
A military judge abuses his discretion if he accepts a guilty plea without an adequate factual basis to support it or if he does so based on an erroneous view of the law. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:21 pm by Anthony Zaller
  The requirement to obtain a food handler’s card does not apply to a food handler who is employed by any of the following: (1) Certified farmer’s markets [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:06 am by Bill Marler
 It put what the FDA does – and does not do – in context. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 3:03 am by Liz Dunshee
See Instruction 1 to Paragraphs (b)(101)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
Moses on the defendant does not contain the wording required in Rule 37B(1)(c)(iii)… [7] In Lau v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 11:15 am by Giles Peaker
—(1) Subject to paragraphs (2), (3), and (5), no person may attend at a dwelling house for the purpose of— (a) executing a writ or warrant of possession; (b) executing a writ or warrant of restitution; or (c) delivering a notice of eviction. (2) Paragraph (1) does not apply where the court is satisfied that the notice, writ or warrant relates to an order for possession made— (a) against trespassers pursuant to a claim to… [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 7:05 pm
Counter offer (8) An offer to settle does not expire by reason that a counter offer is made. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those states were Alabama[8], Illinois[9], Kentucky[10], Louisiana[11], Tennessee[12], and Washington[13]. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm by Law Lady
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida.Bankruptcy -- Claims -- Administrative expenses -- Priority -- Conversion of bankruptcy case from chapter 11 case to chapter 7 case does not impact the priority of a chapter 11 super-priority claim granted under Section 364(c)(1) of Bankruptcy Code, whether or not that claim is viewed as administrative claimIn re: NATIONAL LITHO, LLC, Debtors. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 12:36 pm by Holland & Hart
  Title VII Has No Knowledge Requirement  In an 8-to-1 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that an employer that refuses to hire an applicant to avoid accommodating a religious practice may be liable for discrimination even though the applicant did not inform the employer of the need for an accommodation. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 5:30 pm by David Cheifetz
So where does that leave us? [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:00 am by Steven M. Gursten
According to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Rules, a truck driver qualification file must include seven things: 1. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:56 am by Nassiri Law
More Blog Entries: California Worker Wins Wrongful Termination Lawsuit, January 1, 2014, Los Angeles Employment Lawyer Blog [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
So, for example, if I'm on parole for theft with 8 years to go, am falsely accused of rape and murder, then proven innocent by DNA 25 years later, should I be compensated for 25 or 17 years wrongful incarceration? [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 4:52 pm
Plaintiff appealed the court's ruling as to the Franchise Act claim only, alleging that Defendant's had violated section 4(e)(8) of the Act by granting an additional franchise within Plaintiff's relevant market area and refusing to extend the first contract that granted Plaintiff all of Illinois as its exclusive sales territory. [read post]