Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 7061 - 7080
of 28,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm
That decision, the 1997 case City of Boerne v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:14 am
This is the latest in a series of opinions that makes clear that the federal judiciary is starting to take a different attitude towards internet-only child pornography cases; e.g., being very dubious of lifetime residency restrictions that essentially require the defendant to live in a rural area for the rest of his life.The only thing I'll add to the opinion is that the court might want to include an actual citation in footnote seven, which reads: "The California… [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2011] EWHC 2616 (Admin) – Read judgment On 13 October 2011 Mr Justice Supperstone in the High Court held that changes to rules for calculating housing benefit were lawful and in particular did not breach equality legislation. [read post]
9 May 2012, 10:01 pm
In her March 28, 2012 decision in Rome v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:26 am
(Para. 4 of Brown v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:59 pm
In Dossett v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 9:22 am
Williams v The London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37 was about the opposite scenario; where a local authority wanted to accommodate but the parents wanted the children back. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 5:32 am
Here are the materials in Baker v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 10:03 am
US v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 3:52 pm
One of the trickier parts of the "evolving standards of decency" analysis in Kennedy v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:46 pm
CHILD EXPOSED TO LEAD-BASED PAINT IN APARTMENT: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN PREMISES: DANGEROUS CONDITION: BRAIN DAMAGE: Perez v. 2246 Holding Corp., N.Y., Kings Co. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 4:40 pm
A spoiled child is never very attractive. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 2:22 am
In Noble v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 9:05 am
Borra v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 8:26 am
Mathis v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 12:54 pm
Simon" and "Colorado v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:16 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 7:59 am
J.G. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
She emphasized that, based on established case law, a third party does not have standing to create a custody dispute “unless the third party is a guardian of the child or has a substantive right of entitlement to custody of the child” (Ruppel v Lesner, 421 Mich 559 (1984)). [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:34 pm
" [Lovlace v. [read post]
